ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamnegard, C.
Right arrow Articles by Moxham, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamnegard, C.
Right arrow Articles by Moxham, J
Eur Respir J 1998; 12: 693-697
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1998


Clinical Trial

Maximum rate of change in oesophageal pressure assessed from unoccluded breaths: an option where mouth occlusion pressure is impractical

CH Hamnegard, MI Polkey, D Kyroussis, GH Mills, M Green, B Bake, and J Moxham

The mouth occlusion pressure 100 ms after onset of inspiration (P0.1) is considered a clinically useful measure of the combined output of the respiratory centre and muscle pump. However, theoretical and practical difficulties can arise when using P0.1 in the assessment of patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It was hypothesized that the maximum rate of change in oesophageal pressure (dPoes,max/dt) may be an alternative to P0.1. To test this hypothesis P0.1 was compared with mean dPoes,max/dt measured from neighbouring unoccluded breaths in five normal subjects during CO2 rebreathing. In all subjects a close correlation was found between both dPoes,max/dt and P0.1 and carbon dioxide tension (PCO2). In six patients with severe COPD performing exhaustive treadmill walks, dPoes,max/dt was found to increase progressively with walking time. Mean dPoes,max/dt at the start was 6.2 cmH2O x 100 ms(-1) and at the finish was 18.7 cmH2O x 100 ms(-1) (p<0.03). In conclusion, the maximum rate of change in oesophageal pressure measured from unoccluded breaths could be an alternative in circumstances where it is not feasible to use measurements of the mouth occlusion pressure 100 ms after onset of inspiration.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
F. J. O'Donoghue, P. G. Catcheside, D. J. Eckert, and R. D. McEvoy
Changes in respiration in NREM sleep in hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
J. Physiol., September 1, 2004; 559(2): 663 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. HAYOT, M. RAMONATXO, S. MATECKI, J. MILIC-EMILI, and C. PREFAUT
Noninvasive Assessment of Inspiratory Muscle Function during Exercise
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 1, 2000; 162(6): 2201 - 2207.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the European Respiratory Society.