ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Bruin, P.
Right arrow Articles by Pride, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Bruin, P.
Right arrow Articles by Pride, N.
Eur Respir J 1998; 12: 672-678
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1998


Clinical Trial

Use of mouth pressure twitches induced by cervical magnetic stimulation to assess voluntary activation of the diaphragm

PF de Bruin, RA Watson, N Khalil, and NB Pride

There is a need for a simple method to assess the adequacy of diaphragm activation during voluntary inspiratory efforts in patients with suspected respiratory muscle weakness. We have compared mouth (Pmo,t), oesophageal (Poes,t) and transdiaphragmatic (Pdi,t) twitch pressure elicited by cervical magnetic stimulation (CMS) in five normal men (mean (SD) age 32.2 (1.8) yrs) on two separate study days. Single magnetic stimuli were delivered at functional residual capacity during relaxation and during graded voluntary inspiratory efforts against a closed airway. As voluntary-effort transdiaphragmatic and oesophageal pressure increased, Pdi,t and Poes,t decreased linearly (r range, respectively, 0.82-0.98 and 0.87-0.95). During relaxation, Pmo,t was unreliable due to the poor transmission of intrathoracic pressure, but during inspiratory efforts, the relation between voluntary mouth pressure and Pmo,t was also linear (r range 0.84-0.95). On average, our subjects voluntarily generated 99, 100 and 102% of the maximum transdiaphragmatic, oesophageal and mouth pressures predicted by the respective linear regression equations. Pmo,t was correlated to both Poes,t and Pdi,t during inspiratory efforts, but not during relaxation. These studies confirm that twitch pressures induced by CMS during inspiratory efforts can be assessed at the mouth in normal subjects, providing a simple and non-invasive technique for assessing diaphragm activation during voluntary inspiratory efforts. Potentially, this technique could be made more sensitive and accurate and applied to detect submaximal efforts in patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
W. Windisch, H.-J. Kabitz, and S. Sorichter
Influence of Different Trigger Techniques on Twitch Mouth Pressure During Bilateral Anterior Magnetic Phrenic Nerve Stimulation
Chest, July 1, 2005; 128(1): 190 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
S. Jonville, N. Delpech, and A. Denjean
Contribution of respiratory acidosis to diaphragmatic fatigue at exercise
Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2002; 19(6): 1079 - 1086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. HAYOT, M. RAMONATXO, S. MATECKI, J. MILIC-EMILI, and C. PREFAUT
Noninvasive Assessment of Inspiratory Muscle Function during Exercise
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 1, 2000; 162(6): 2201 - 2207.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the European Respiratory Society.