ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kips, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pauwels, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kips, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pauwels, R.
Eur Respir J 1998; 11: 529-533
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1998


Original Articles

Methods of examining induced sputum: do differences matter?

JC Kips, RA Peleman, and RA Pauwels

Analysis of induced sputum has been proposed as a direct, relatively noninvasive method for the evaluation of airway inflammation in diseases such as asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). An important question in the validation of this technique concerns the potential influence of differences in the methods of examining sputum. Up to the present time, two basic techniques for processing sputum have been described. The first approach consists of selecting all viscid portions from the expectorated sample, whereas the second approach processes the whole expectorate, containing sputum plus saliva. Both processing techniques have been shown to provide valid and reliable data on the composition of the cellular and soluble fraction of induced sputum. From the data currently available, it would therefore appear that the usefulness of induced sputum as a method for assessing airway inflammation is not influenced by differences in the methods currently used for examining sputum.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
H. K. Reddel, D. R. Taylor, E. D. Bateman, L.-P. Boulet, H. A. Boushey, W. W. Busse, T. B. Casale, P. Chanez, P. L. Enright, P. G. Gibson, et al.
An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Asthma Control and Exacerbations: Standardizing Endpoints for Clinical Asthma Trials and Clinical Practice
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 2009; 180(1): 59 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M. I. Zervou, E. G. Tzortzaki, D. Makris, M. Gaga, E. Zervas, E. Economidou, M. Tsoumakidou, N. Tzanakis, J. Milic-Emili, and N. M. Siafakas
Differences in microsatellite DNA level between asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2006; 28(3): 472 - 478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
I.E. Zuhlke, F. Kanniess, K. Richter, D. Nielsen-Gode, S. Bohme, R.A. Jorres, and H. Magnussen
Montelukast attenuates the airway response to hypertonic saline in moderate-to-severe COPD
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2003; 22(6): 926 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
E. Paraskakis, G. Sourvinos, F. Passam, N. Tzanakis, E.G. Tzortzaki, M. Zervou, D. Spandidos, and N.M. Siafakas
Microsatellite DNA instability and loss of heterozygosity in bronchial asthma
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2003; 22(6): 951 - 955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
C. TAUBE, O. HOLZ, M. MUCKE, R. A. JORRES, and H. MAGNUSSEN
Airway Response to Inhaled Hypertonic Saline in Patients with Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2001; 164(10): 1810 - 1815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. D. LEUPPI, C. M. SALOME, C. R. JENKINS, S. D. ANDERSON, W. XUAN, G. B. MARKS, H. KOSKELA, J. D. BRANNAN, R. FREED, M. ANDERSSON, et al.
Predictive Markers of Asthma Exacerbation during Stepwise Dose Reduction of Inhaled Corticosteroids
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2001; 163(2): 406 - 412.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. KUMLIN
Measurement of Leukotrienes in Humans
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2000; 161(2): S102 - 106.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
R. A. Peleman, V. Van De Velde, P. R. Germonpré, C. Fleurinck, M. T. Rosseel, and R. A. Pauwels
Trovafloxacin Concentrations in Airway Fluids of Patients with Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2000; 44(1): 178 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. JATAKANON, S. LIM, and P. J. BARNES
Changes in Sputum Eosinophils Predict Loss of Asthma Control
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2000; 161(1): 64 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
F. E. HARGREAVE and R. LEIGH
Induced Sputum, Eosinophilic Bronchitis, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 1999; 160(5): S53 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the European Respiratory Society.