Eur Respir J 1997; 10: 905-909
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1997
Comparison of jet and ultrasonic nebulizer pulmonary aerosol deposition during mechanical ventilation
CJ Harvey,
MJ O'Doherty,
CJ Page,
SH Thomas,
TO Nunan,
and
DF Treacher
Increased delivery of aerosol to a model lung (attached to a mechanical ventilator) has been demonstrated with an ultrasonic nebulizer as compared to a jet nebulizer. This study examined whether the increased aerosol deposition with an ultrasonic nebulizer could also be demonstrated in vivo. Seven patients (6 male and 1 female) were studied during mechanical ventilalion (Siemens Servo 900C, Middlesex, UK) after open heart surgery. Two studies were performed in each patient. In the first study, aerosol was delivered via a Siemens Servo 945 nebulizer system (high setting) driving a System 22 Acorn jet nebulizer (Medic-Aid, Sussex, UK) containing 3 mL (99m)technetium-labelled human serum albumin (99mTc-HSA) (50 microg; activity 74 MBq). In the second study, a DP100 ultrasonic nebulizer (DP Medical, Meylan, France) containing 12 mL 99mTc-HSA (50 microg; activity 185 MBq) was used. Pulmonary deposition was quantified using a gamma camera. The humidification of the circuit and the ventilator settings were kept constant according to the patient's clinical requirements. The total lung aerosol deposition (mean+/-SD), as a percentage of initial nebulizer activity, was greater using the ultrasonic nebulizer than using the jet nebulizer (53+/-1.4 vs 2.3+/-0.9%; p<0.002). The ultrasonic nebulizer was also associated with a reduction in the time required to complete nebulization (9 vs 21 min, respectively) (p<0.0001). Use of the DP100 ultrasonic nebulizer more than doubled lung deposition compared with the System 22 jet nebulizers in mechanically-ventilated patients. Their efficiency, speed of drug delivery, and compatibility with mechanical ventilator circuits make ultrasonic nebulizers potentially attractive for use during mechanical ventilation.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P Phipps and C S Garrard
The pulmonary physician in critical care * 12: Acute severe asthma in the intensive care unit
Thorax,
January 1, 2003;
58(1):
81 - 88.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Goldstein, F. Wallet, A. Nicolas-Robin, F. Ferrari, C.-H. Marquette, and J.-J. Rouby
Lung Deposition and Efficiency of Nebulized Amikacin during Escherichia coli Pneumonia in Ventilated Piglets
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
November 15, 2002;
166(10):
1375 - 1381.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. GOLDSTEIN, F. WALLET, J. ROBERT, M.-H. BECQUEMIN, C.-H. MARQUETTE, J.-J. ROUBY, and the Experimental ICU Study Group
Lung Tissue Concentrations of Nebulized Amikacin during Mechanical Ventilation in Piglets with Healthy Lungs
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
January 15, 2002;
165(2):
171 - 175.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. H. NUMA, G. D. WILLIAMS, and C. J. DAKIN
The Effect of Nebulized Epinephrine on Respiratory Mechanics and Gas Exchange in Bronchiolitis
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
July 1, 2001;
164(1):
86 - 91.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Jantz and N. A. Collop
Bronchodilator Aerosol Delivery in Mechanical Ventilation: Jantz MA, Collop NA Bronchodilator Aerosol Delivery in Mechanical Ventilation Intensive Care Med 1999,14 166-183
J Intensive Care Med,
July 1, 1999;
14(4):
166 - 183.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1997 by the European Respiratory Society.
|