ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Douma, W.
Right arrow Articles by Postma, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Douma, W.
Right arrow Articles by Postma, D.
Eur Respir J 1997; 10: 457-459
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1997


Original Articles

Mini-Wright peak flow meters are reliable after 5 years use. Dutch CNSLD Study Group

WR Douma, TW van der Mark, HT Folgering, E Kort, HA Kerstjens, GH Koeter, and DS Postma

In studies with a long-term follow-up, peak expiratory flow (PEF) meters are often used to assess bronchial obstruction. The question arises whether data obtained with these frequently used meters are still reliable after several years of use, and whether the old meters should be renewed after a certain period. In the present study, we tested the reliability of PEF values measured with mini-Wright PEF meters that had been used frequently for 5 yrs. The values obtained with these meters were compared with values measured with identical but new meters, in 50 patients with obstructive airways disease. Though statistically significant, there was no clinically significant difference in mean PEF measured with the old and new meters in most patients (mean difference 10.2 L.min-1). However, on an individual basis, the differences between old and new meters could be large (upper and lower limits of agreement (mean +/- 2 SD) being 63.6 and -43.2 L.min-1, respectively). We conclude that mean peak expiratory flow values measured with frequently used mini-Wright peak expiratory flow meters are still reliable after 5 yrs. In long-term studies, renewal of peak expiratory flow meters should be restricted to cases of obvious malfunction.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol Res NursHome page
C. McCarley, S. K. Hanneman, N. Padhye, and M. H. Smolensky
A pilot home study of temporal variations of symptoms in chronic obstructive lung disease.
Biol Res Nurs, July 1, 2007; 9(1): 8 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the European Respiratory Society.