ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sterk, P.
Right arrow Articles by Dijkman, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sterk, P.
Right arrow Articles by Dijkman, J.
Eur Respir J 1988; 1: 34-40
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1988


Clinical Trial

The combined effects of histamine and methacholine on the maximal degree of airway narrowing in normal humans in vivo

PJ Sterk, MC Timmers, EH Bel, and JH Dijkman

In normal subjects in vivo the dose-response curve to inhaled nonsensitizing stimuli reaches a plateau at mild degrees of airway narrowing. We investigated whether the limitation of the response is due to non-optimal smooth muscle activation, by administering high doses of histamine and methacholine together. In fifteen normal subjects a complete dose-response curve to methacholine was recorded by a tidal breathing method on three randomized days. On a separate day a complete histamine inhalation test was carried out. Each methacholine test was directly followed by double blind inhalation of the highest dose of either histamine or methacholine, or a dose of saline. The response was measured by flows from partial flow-volume curves (V 40p), and was expressed in % fall from baseline. Twelve subjects reached a maximal response plateau to methacholine which was reproducible. The addition of saline or extra methacholine did not change the response from its methacholine plateau value. Histamine caused a small increase in the response on top of the methacholine plateau (+ 9.0% fall; p less than 0.001). However, the response to the combined histamine and methacholine was not significantly larger than the maximal response to histamine alone. We conclude that there is no interaction between histamine and methacholine on the maximal degree of airway narrowing. This suggests that the plateau of the dose-response curve in normal subjects in vivo is due to other factors than limited smooth muscle activation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
P. T. Macklem
Cell and Molecular Biology Is not the Only Way to a Better Understanding of Pathogenesis of Lung Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 2004; 170(1): ii - iii.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the European Respiratory Society.