ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print May 14, 2008
Eur Respir J 2008, doi:10.1183/09031936.00126507
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muñoz, X.
Right arrow Articles by Escrich, E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Muñoz, X.
Right arrow Articles by Escrich, E.


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

ACCURACY AND RELIABILITY OF PULSE OXIMETRY AT DIFFERENT PaCO2 LEVELS

X. Muñoz 1*, F. Torres 2, G. Sampol 3, J. Rios 2, S. Martí 3, E. Escrich 4

1 Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Dept de Biología Cel·lular, de Fisiologia i d'Immunologia, UAB, Barcelona, Spain; and CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (Ciberes)
2 Laboratorio de Bioestadística i Epidemiología (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona); Servei de Farmacologia Clínica, IDIBAPS, (Hospital Clínic), Barcelona
3 Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; and CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (Ciberes)
4 Dept de Biología Cel·lular, de Fisiologia i d'Immunologia, UAB, Barcelona, Spain

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: xmunoz{at}vhebron.net.


   Abstract

To assess whether arterial carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO2) has an impact on agreement between oxygen saturation measured with pulse oximetry (SpO2) or arterial blood gas co-oximetry (SaO2).

A study was performed on SaO2 and SpO2 determinations obtained simultaneously from 846 patients under assessment for long-term home oxygen therapy in a specialized outpatient clinic. Both measurements were taken with patients seated and breathing room air.

Agreement between SaO2 and SpO2 results was analyzed by the Bland-Altman method and the Lin concordance coefficient. In addition, potential interactions of PaO2 or PaCO2 on agreement were analyzed by adjusted multivariate analysis.

At comparison of SaO2 and SpO2 results, the Bland-Altman technique yielded a bias (95% CI) of -1.24 (-6.86; 4.38) and -1.32 (-7.78; 5.15) when PaCO2 was higher than 48 mmHg or PaO2 lower than 54 mmHg, respectively. Estimate by Lin's coefficient (95% CI) in these cases was 0.88 (0.85; 0.90) and 0.81 (0.77; 0.85). Adjusted multivariate analysis performed to assess the impact of pH, PaO2, PaCO2, and bicarbonate on bias showed that PaO2, PaCO2 and their interaction term were the most important predictors of the bias (standardized estimates of -0.54, -0.94, and 0.85, respectively). The effect of pH, although statistically significant, was small and bicarbonate had no significant effect.

PaCO2 status can contribute to impairing agreement between SaO2 and SpO2, particularly in patients with hypercapnia.

Keywords:  Co-oximetry, hypercapnia, hypoxemia, oxygen therapy, precision







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the European Respiratory Society.